Comments for A LIFE WORTH LIVING

Comment on Splenda – Exposed Again by admin

admin — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:52:55 +0000

I agree with your thoughts entirely – the studies that were done were stacked to ensure that the results showed there were no effects. We now know that to be patently untrue but who will listen to a small voice in the darkness. There is one sugar that is not only safe but highly beneficial and it’s a simple disaccharide called Trehalose and is both simple to use in place of sucrose and does not raise blood glucose levels. Have a look at http://www.buytrehalose.co.uk and you’ll see a whole new world. A sugar that is an antioxidant and a neuro protectant – unbelievable but true.

Comment on Splenda – Exposed Again by M Khan

M Khan — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:06:38 +0000

Very disturbing findings however it would be nice if some one had studied effects of splenda on body chemistry cholesterol cancer and heart attacks in large number of people.

I am reluctant to use any sweetener even sugar after reading this.

Comment on Splenda – Exposed Again by admin

admin — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:57:19 +0000

hi jamie – i take your point. However, if chlorine is not good for us then why is the world chlorine council phasing out chlorine. Chlorine produces free radical damage and splenda contributes to that damage. The additive effect is cumulative and definitely not good.

Comment on Splenda – Exposed Again by jamie

jamie — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:43:08 +0000

This study was paid for by a sugar company, and just because chlorine = bleach… Doesn’t mean it is bad for you

The effects on rats where when they had about the same amount as the MAXIMUM advised HUMAN dose, which would be like a human having their dose 200 times, this would be literally eating nothing but splenda, and doing so by the kilogram.

Comment on Statins – Wonder drug or Villains? by admin

admin — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:42:04 +0000

Hi John – have you seen Dr Duane Graveline MD site http://www.spacedoc.net/ I heard him speak a few years back and am a clear supporter. Thanks for the link – I’m one of those long term historical users that won’t even register on the stats because I’m considered outside the risk group
paul

Comment on Statins – Wonder drug or Villains? by John Brooks

John Brooks — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:01:37 +0000

The US Congressional financing arm – the Senate Finance Committee agree with you and rightly so:
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/sep2009/tc20090918_115353.htm?campaign_id=yhoo

Keep the pressure on.

Best,

Another statin effected casualty.

Comment on The Great Cholesterol Con Trick – Again by Statins – Wonder drug or Vilains? | A LIFE WORTH LIVING

Statins – Wonder drug or Vilains? | A LIFE WORTH LIVING — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:22:17 +0000

[...] Water Supply by admin My wife sent me this article adapted from the daily Express. I took Simvastin, a powerful Stain drug, for 15 years and today 15 years on – I’m rarely free from [...]

Comment on Statins – More Trouble Unearthed by Statins – Wonder drug or Vilains? | A LIFE WORTH LIVING

Statins – Wonder drug or Vilains? | A LIFE WORTH LIVING — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:19:38 +0000

[...] Statins have been hailed as a “wonder drug” for reducing cholesterol and preventing tens of thousands of heart attacks and strokes. Some proponents are even suggesting we should put them in the water supply – Crazy in my opinion. But experts are becoming worried by the unpleasant reactions that some patients are experiencing. [...]

Comment on Trehalose – A Sugar that actually helps by Pam Murphy,M.S.,RRT

Pam Murphy,M.S.,RRT — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:49:55 +0000

And more importantly, there have been studies using Trehalose with both parkinson and huntingtons patients which are showing great promise.

Comment on Statins – More Trouble Unearthed by Stephen Guy-Clarke

Stephen Guy-Clarke — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:35:21 +0000

Good article about statins.
Cardiologist Peter Langsjoen notes that statin treatment may lead to heart muscle weakening and failure. ‘It occurs because statin drugs block the production of coenzyme Q10, vital for the production of cell energy,’ says Langsjoen. ‘Evidence to the FDA shows marked reduction of CoQ10 in patients on statin drugs.’

Another point to be borne in mind is the use of long term drug therapy to lower cholesterol levels, where it is unclear what the full effects might be over a 30 year period. In spite of this, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gives approval for this class of drugs on the basis of less than 10 years’ clinical trials.