<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Splenda &#8211; Exposed Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sugars4life.com/uncategorized/splenda-exposed-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sugars4life.com/uncategorized/splenda-exposed-again/</link>
	<description>using science and food to improve health</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:52:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.sugars4life.com/uncategorized/splenda-exposed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15605</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sugars4life.com/?p=316#comment-15605</guid>
		<description>I agree with your thoughts entirely - the studies that were done were stacked to ensure that the results showed there were no effects. We now know that to be patently untrue but who will listen to a small voice in the darkness. There is one sugar that is not only safe but highly beneficial and it&#039;s a simple disaccharide called Trehalose and is both simple to use in place of sucrose and does not raise blood glucose levels. Have a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buytrehalose.co.uk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.buytrehalose.co.uk&lt;/a&gt; and you&#039;ll see a whole new world. A sugar that is an antioxidant and a neuro protectant - unbelievable but true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your thoughts entirely &#8211; the studies that were done were stacked to ensure that the results showed there were no effects. We now know that to be patently untrue but who will listen to a small voice in the darkness. There is one sugar that is not only safe but highly beneficial and it&#8217;s a simple disaccharide called <a href="http://www.sugars4life.com/recommends/trehalose" style="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" onmouseover="self.status='http://www.sugars4life.com/recommends/trehalose';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">Trehalose</a> and is both simple to use in place of sucrose and does not raise blood glucose levels. Have a look at <a href="http://www.buytrehalose.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.buytrehalose.co.uk</a> and you&#8217;ll see a whole new world. A sugar that is an antioxidant and a neuro protectant &#8211; unbelievable but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Khan</title>
		<link>http://www.sugars4life.com/uncategorized/splenda-exposed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15599</link>
		<dc:creator>M Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sugars4life.com/?p=316#comment-15599</guid>
		<description>Very disturbing findings however it would be nice if some one had studied effects of splenda on body chemistry cholesterol cancer and heart attacks in large number of people. 

I am reluctant to use any sweetener even sugar after reading this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very disturbing findings however it would be nice if some one had studied effects of splenda on body chemistry <a href="http://www.sugars4life.com/cholesterol" style=""  rel="nofollow" onmouseover="self.status='http://www.sugars4life.com/cholesterol';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">cholesterol</a> cancer and heart attacks in large number of people. </p>
<p>I am reluctant to use any sweetener even sugar after reading this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.sugars4life.com/uncategorized/splenda-exposed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-11809</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sugars4life.com/?p=316#comment-11809</guid>
		<description>hi jamie - i take your point. However, if chlorine is not good for us then why is the world chlorine council phasing out chlorine. Chlorine produces free radical damage and splenda contributes to that damage. The additive effect is cumulative and definitely not good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi jamie &#8211; i take your point. However, if chlorine is not good for us then why is the world chlorine council phasing out chlorine. Chlorine produces free radical damage and splenda contributes to that damage. The additive effect is cumulative and definitely not good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.sugars4life.com/uncategorized/splenda-exposed-again/comment-page-1/#comment-11781</link>
		<dc:creator>jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sugars4life.com/?p=316#comment-11781</guid>
		<description>This study was paid for by a sugar company, and just because chlorine = bleach... Doesn&#039;t mean it is bad for you

The effects on rats where when they had about the same amount as the MAXIMUM advised HUMAN dose, which would be like a human having their dose 200 times, this would be literally eating nothing but splenda, and doing so by the kilogram.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This study was paid for by a sugar company, and just because chlorine = bleach&#8230; Doesn&#8217;t mean it is bad for you</p>
<p>The effects on rats where when they had about the same amount as the MAXIMUM advised HUMAN dose, which would be like a human having their dose 200 times, this would be literally eating nothing but splenda, and doing so by the kilogram.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
